Research

Jev, Laya and the rest of the field-coverage roster answer millions of bounded questions a day, so we run the experiments that check what they're actually doing: where their verdicts move on a name or a pronoun, how well their confidence tracks reality, and what survives when you fine-tune, distill or gate them. Every piece here comes with the method and the numbers, not just the headline. If you're here to align Jev or another decision model to your own data, start with the guide at /decision-models/.

  • Can Averaging Reduce Noise in an AI Decision Model?

    October 1, 2026

    We asked Jev the same question ten times in one request and expected ten identical answers. They split, four votes to six. Kahneman, Sibony and Sunstein call that kind of variation noise. Averaging the copies didn't make Jev more accurate, but it cut changed answers on a rerun by about a third.

  • Decision Models Are Not Calculators

    September 25, 2026

    Jev chose one in every ordering of a fair-die question; Kev leaned toward one, and Laya overwhelmingly chose six. Benford's Law remains a hypothesis.

  • Can You Fix It? Gating, Averaging and Fine-Tuning Against a Gendered Verdict

    September 22, 2026

    A decision model's verdict moves on "she". We put a gate on the learning loop that rejects any question whose answer moves with the pronoun. It kept out the obvious ones and still made a hiring shortlist worse, because a question can ignore the pronoun and read gender from the words. Here's what worked instead.

  • We Told the AI She Was a Woman. It Demoted Her

    September 22, 2026

    A new kind of AI, the decision model, makes instant decisions about people: who gets an interview, whose claim gets flagged. It's cheap and fast, and companies are adopting it without checking what it does. We checked. It quietly ranks women lawyers below men, and every company using it makes the same mistake.

Earlier